you are here [x]: Scarlet Star Studios > the Scarlet Letters > new armature: the drifter
<< before the comeback kid
after >> artist's way guided intent (april)

April 4, 2007

new armature: the drifter

by sven at 9:00 pm

beauty shot

The "Drifter" is the fourth jointed armature that I've made in my own shop. Making it took 45 hours, over the course of 11 days.

It's made entirely of steel: 1018 for plates and rods, 302 for balls. The joints are all sandwich plate ball-and-socket. It stands 8 and 1/16" tall.

full body

Why do I call it the "Drifter?" Well, because... Due to a mistake in how I engineered the ball sockets, every joint has a bad case of drift. Drat!

["Drift" is when a the ball is biased to follow a certain arc of motion, rather than moving smoothly in all directions.]

demonstrating a lean

One of the first tests you do on an armature is putting it into an extreme lean. If your puppet can't lean forward without falling over, it can't walk or run. This armature passes the test. (The ankles have to be pretty tight, though.)

jointed feet

A notable feature of this armature is that it has jointed feet. Fussy to make -- but having a toe as well as an ankle allows you to animate walks much more realistically.

action pose #1: run

I'm not intending to put the Drifter inside a puppet. He's part of a series that I'm doing in order to teach myself the art of armature-making. I've already made a display stand for him. And I have plans outlined for my next two learning projects.

action pose #2: sumo

My past three armatures were meant to have human proportions. For this one, I had more of a "gnome" body in mind -- wider in the torso, and with long feet.

I had intended to give this design step-block hands... But when I discovered the drift problem, I decided to leave that for the next project. (Which I'm thinking will be constructed entirely from step-block joints -- no sandwich plates.)

comparison with "Man of Steel"

Here's a comparison of the Drifter with my last home project, the Man of Steel...

close-up

I have qualms about the Drifter's performance. However, my design and machining skills have come a long way during the past six months. My accuracy and efficiency in constructing this armature were far superior to the last attempt. The brazing job is much more reliable, and I was able to get a much better shine on the metal...

All in all, excellent progress.

posted by sven | April 4, 2007 9:00 PM | comments (7) | categories: stopmo

Comments

Great looking armature!! Your skills as an armature machinists are getting along fantastically! Keep up the great work!

:)

Posted by: Chris at April 4, 2007 9:44 PM

the sumo pose is anerable!

Posted by: gl. at April 5, 2007 2:14 AM

Well-done Sven, good progress. I see a big improvement in craftsmanship.

Drift is a nasty troubling problem. It can be caused by lots of things but one common cause is the misalignment of the ball seats on a set of sandwich plates.

Now you see the beauty of LIO's thru hole method and drilling the plates stacked - Amazingly simple and effective.

Of course the step block will eliminate the misalignment problem because the non step half of the sandwich is free to move a bit and will naturally align with the ball.

Don't you just love those scotch bright deburring wheels?

Good progress I like how you did the jointed ball on the foot, and that ankle joint is holding a pretty serious lean!

Posted by: mark F. at April 5, 2007 8:15 AM

super ultra Powerfull Sven!!!

that is some cool stuff your learnin.....and doin. jriggity

Posted by: justin rasch at April 5, 2007 10:28 PM

Chris, gl., Mark, Justin -- thank you!

@Chris: So glad to see you here! I didn't know you were reading... Welcome!

@Mark: I feel pretty confident about the alignment of the holes... I hope that's not the issue.

(Plus, with the play that the screws' through-holes allow, I would think that there's some self-centering action going on -- except for on the joints with 3 balls.)

My thinking at this point is that it has to do with bottom point of the socket -- perhaps this is a problem with the shape of the ball-nosed end mill?

I've seen sockets that have a small hole cut into the bottom of their cup... Maybe this corrects for the shape of the cutter?

Even if it doesn't, I figure drilling a hole there will give you a hybrid socket/open-hole joint that ought to have the best of both worlds. Must do some tests...

Posted by: sven at April 6, 2007 2:29 AM

Nice! Sleek and streamlined, like a Porsche compared to the Buick that is the man of Steel. A shame about the drift problem. That's the price you pay for stepping up to the next level of craftsmanship..... as LIO and Trikfx are so fond of saying, the actual fully machined BS joints are so much more finnicky than open holes. The slightest offset in tolerance and you've got problems.

Now you're at a point where you have to decide..... keep going forward and hope to gain enough skill to defeat the problem, or step back to the open hole system for its durable simplicity. I know what my choice would be (and I suspect you do too). But it sounds like you have something in mind with the step block system.

Are you aware that often B&S armatures are lubricated with grease? maybe that would help eliminate drifting? I'm sure Mark could tell you a lot more about it that I ever could though.... you're way outside of my range of knowledge here.

Posted by: Darkstrider at April 7, 2007 2:25 AM

Hey Mike --

I suspect what's going to happen with me is this: On the one hand, I'll keep working on more sophisticated, professional-like armatures -- and on the other hand, I'll start putting open-hole armatures inside of puppets.

My sense is that when a particular armature design no longer feels challenging to me -- when it becomes a hum-drum matter to whip one up -- that's when I'll begin feeling comfortable burying the metal in foam. Open-hole joint armatures are almost at that point now...

I had heard about using grease in B&S armatures -- but somehow I thought there was controversy around the practice... Like, on the one hand using grease will make the motion smoother -- but on the other, it makes it more difficult for a joint to hold a pose. Do you recall ever having seen this discussion?

Posted by: sven at April 12, 2007 1:18 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?


You may use HTML tags or Markdown syntax in your comments:
*emphasized*, **strong**, & [link](http://www.foo.com).

No need for <p> or <br> tags.